← all articles

rewind ai open source alternative: 6 projects, checked

the honest answer for anyone after a rewind ai open source alternative, as of october 2026: real options exist, but none is a finished, open source rewind. pensieve (apache 2.0) and openrecall (agpl 3.0) are the most capable projects with osi approved open source licences.

windrecorder (gpl 2.0) is windows only. dayflow (mit) is a mac work journal, and rem (mit) stopped shipping in 2024. screenpipe, the busiest, is source available under its own commercial licence. in our judgement, each asks you to own more of the upkeep than rewind did.

was rewind ai open source?

no, rewind ai was never open source, which is part of why its users had nothing to fall back on.

rewind was a closed source app for mac and iphone. when meta bought the company, by then called limitless, an update disabled all screen and audio capture starting december 19, 2025. with no published code, nobody could keep it running, and every open source rewind project on github is a separate rebuild, not a fork.

the longer story is in what happened to rewind ai, and if you still have old data, see how to export rewind ai data.

the six projects, side by side

we checked each repo's licence file, readme and release history on october 21, 2026.

projectlicenceplatformslast releasewhat it capturessetupgithub stars
screenpipescreenpipe commercial license (source available)macos, windows, linuxapp v2.7.116, oct 21, 2026screenshots on events, accessibility text, ocr fallback, system audio and micinstaller app22,021
pensieveapache 2.0mac, windows; linux in developmentv0.37.0, jun 19, 2026screenshots of every screen, ocr, model descriptions, browser urlspip, plus local or api models1,395
openrecallagpl 3.0windows, macos, linuxno tagged release; last commit sep 24, 2025regular screenshots, local ocr, semantic searchpython 3.11 and pip from git2,962
windrecordergpl 2.0windows only0.1.0, sep 25, 2026 (changelog)screen video, ocr text, page titles, browser urlsffmpeg, git and uv by hand3,962
dayflowmitmacos 14 or laterv2.7.3, oct 21, 2026screen chunks turned into an ai written timelinedmg or homebrew7,306
remmitmacosv0.1.14, may 30, 2024a screenshot every 2 seconds, with text recognitionprebuilt app2,488

which one runs on your machine?

your operating system cuts the list before anything else does.

  • mac: screenpipe, pensieve, openrecall and dayflow. rem only if you accept an alpha that has not shipped in over two years.
  • windows: windrecorder, screenpipe, pensieve and openrecall. microsoft's own recall needs a copilot+ pc with a 40 tops npu, 16 gb of ram and 256 gb of storage.
  • linux: screenpipe, through an appimage, and openrecall. pensieve lists linux as in development.

what does each project actually capture?

they all take pictures of your screen, but what they keep and how they search it varies a lot.

screenpipe captures on events such as app switches and clicks, reads the accessibility tree for text, and falls back to ocr. it also records system audio and your mic, transcribed by local whisper or deepgram's cloud. official builds have a free plan, with full history at $25 a month or $250 a year on its pricing page. we compare it with the original in screenpipe vs rewind.

pensieve, formerly called memos, screenshots every screen and indexes them with ocr, a vision language model and embeddings. it plugs into ollama or any openai compatible api. the optional minicpm v model takes about 5.5 gb, and the readme recommends an nvidia card with 8 gb of vram or an m series mac.

openrecall takes regular screenshots, skips near duplicates, and runs local ocr for semantic search. its readme says no internet connection or cloud is required, and recommends keeping the data on an encrypted volume.

windrecorder screenshots every 3 seconds by default and turns them into video every 15 minutes, or records straight to video through ffmpeg. version 0.1.0 added a read only skill so an ai agent can search your records.

dayflow writes a timeline of your day using the model you pick: ollama, lm studio, a gemini key, or chatgpt and claude through their command line tools. it is a work journal more than a searchable frame archive.

rem screenshots every 2 seconds and recognizes the text. it still calls itself very alpha.

what does self hosting really cost you?

self hosting moves four jobs from a vendor to you: models, updates, storage and security.

  1. models. ocr engines, embedding models and vision models download and run on your hardware. if you want rewind style answers in plain english, you also run a local llm, which our local llm guide for mac covers. all of it costs cpu: screenpipe's readme estimates 5% to 20% while capturing, against the 1% to 5% rewind claimed on apple silicon.
  2. updates. python tools break in quiet ways. pensieve's readme notes that macos ties screen recording permission to the python binary path, so upgrading python means granting it again. openrecall has no tagged releases at all.
  3. storage. windrecorder documents 10 to 20 gb of video a month plus about 160 mb of database, and its compression presets can shrink video to 0.1x to 0.7x of that. screenpipe's pricing page lists about 30 gb a month. rewind's homepage in may 2024 said users typically used 14 gb a month, thanks to a claimed 3,750x compression rate.
  4. security. encryption is your job. microsoft says recall encrypts its snapshots and search index, while openrecall's readme tells you to create an encrypted volume yourself.

what self hosting saves is the subscription. rewind's 2024 pricing page charged $19 a month billed yearly for pro, and screenpipe's official basic plan is $25 a month or $250 a year. a source build of any of these six, for personal use, costs nothing.

the licences are the easy part. agpl, gpl, apache and mit all allow personal use. screenpipe's licence is the one with commercial limits, so read it before using a source build at work.

which rewind ai open source alternative should you pick?

in our judgement, the right self hosted rewind alternative depends on how much maintenance you will actually do.

  • screenpipe if you want the most capable, most actively shipped tool and accept a source available licence. it had 13 app releases in the 30 days to october 21, 2026.
  • pensieve if a true open source licence matters and you are comfortable with python and local models.
  • windrecorder if you are on windows and want video playback with ocr search.
  • dayflow if what you want is a daily journal of your work rather than an archive of every frame.
  • skip openrecall unless you plan to maintain it, and skip rem, which has not shipped since 2024.

for the wider field, including tools that are not open source, see rewind ai alternatives and our remynd vs screenpipe comparison.

if you want the archive local without running it yourself

remynd is not open source: it is a closed source mac app, and we would rather say so plainly than blur it.

what it offers instead is the local archive without the upkeep. it records the windows on your screen except the ones you exclude, and reads text from the window you are working in with apple vision, on your mac. call audio is transcribed on your mac with an mlx model, and control + space opens search. you choose the apps and sites it never records.

it is free to download for apple silicon macs on macos 14 or later. the archive of what you saw should live on your own mac, so a vendor shutting down can't take it with them.

download remynd for mac and keep the archive on your own disk without running the stack yourself.

common questions

was rewind ai open source? +
no. rewind was a closed source app for mac and iphone, and both openrecall and screenpipe mark it as closed in their own comparison tables. when meta bought the company and capture was disabled on december 19, 2025, there was no code left for anyone to fork.
what is the best open source rewind alternative? +
in our judgement, pensieve if you want a true open source licence (apache 2.0) on mac or windows and can run python and local models. screenpipe is more capable and more active, but it is source available under its own commercial licence, not open source. on windows only, windrecorder is the pick.
is screenpipe open source? +
its code is public on github, but the screenpipe commercial license allows free use only for personal, noncommercial, educational and research work, and commercial use of the source needs a paid enterprise licence. that makes it source available, not open source in the osi sense.
is there an open source rewind for mac? +
yes. screenpipe, pensieve, openrecall and dayflow all run on macos as of october 2026. rem was built for the mac and is mit licensed, but its last release was may 30, 2024, and it still calls itself very alpha.
how much disk does a self hosted rewind alternative use? +
windrecorder documents 10 to 20 gb of video a month plus about 160 mb of database, screenpipe's pricing page says about 30 gb a month, and rewind said its users typically used 14 gb a month. set retention before you start, not after the disk fills.